libreboot

Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
Log | Files | Refs | README

commit a147f669d54c49383c556e0478eb6276124ab188
parent 6121f782e6ab884bdc0dce640d5fe886b33a2f76
Author: Francis Rowe <info@gluglug.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:42:25 +0100

docs/hcl/c201.html: s/"not ideal"/"ethically questionable"

Diffstat:
docs/hcl/c201.html | 4++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/hcl/c201.html b/docs/hcl/c201.html @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ endorsed at all, and mistakes can happen. </p> <p> - <b>Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is not ideal because it distributes proprietary software, + <b>Note that this does not mean Debian is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Debian is ethically questionable because it distributes proprietary software, even if it's optional and not included by default. At the same time, they also do amazing work on things like reproducible builds (recent example), and it's the underpin design upon which Trisquel is ultimately based. Debian does a lot of good work, so it's a shame that they have this silly issue, even after several years.</b> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Then, delete <i>linux</i> and replace it with <a href="http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/">linux-libre</a>. </p> <p> - <b>Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is not ideal because it distributes proprietary software, + <b>Note that this does not mean Fedora is ok! Far from it! Institutionally, Fedora is ethically questionable because it distributes proprietary software, even if it's easy to remove.</b> </p> <p>